From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: walsender & parallelism |
Date: | 2017-06-03 03:39:15 |
Message-ID: | 20170603033915.4ocjvvacpg6wntvo@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-06-02 23:27:55 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/31/17 23:54, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 5/29/17 22:01, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 01:45:59PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>> On May 23, 2017 1:42:41 PM EDT, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> so this didn't really move anywhere AFAICS, do we think the approach
> >>>> I've chosen is good or do we want to do something else here?
> >>>
> >>> Can you add it to the open items list?
> >>
> >> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
> >
> > I have posted an update. The next update will be Friday.
>
> Andres is now working on this. Let's give him a bit of time. ;-)
Yep.
I've posted patches for most things in this thread over at
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20170603002023.rcppadggfiaav377%40alap3.anarazel.de
because the proper fixes here are only possible after resolving the
discussion there. The only thing I know of that's going remaining
afterwards is SIGHUP handling, of which there's already a patch in this
thread (although I want to prune its scope before committing).
I suspect that the review for those will probably happen over the next
few days, I plan to push those afterwards.
- Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2017-06-03 04:58:40 | Re: Server ignores contents of SASLInitialResponse |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-06-03 03:27:55 | Re: walsender & parallelism |