Re: Replication origins and timelines

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication origins and timelines
Date: 2017-06-01 01:36:01
Message-ID: 20170601013601.acomyqo6mmi5pvca@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-05-31 21:33:26 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > This only starts becoming an issue once logical replication slots can
> > exist on replicas and be maintained to follow the master's slot state.
> > Which is incomplete in Pg10 (not exposed to users) but I plan to
> > finish getting in for pg11, making this a possible issue to be
> > addressed.
>
> Fair enough. I'm disappointed that we ended up with that as the
> solution for PG10

This has widely been debated, and it's not exactly new that development
happens incrementally, so I don't have particularly much sympathy for
that POV.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-06-01 01:36:14 Re: Replication origins and timelines
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-06-01 01:33:28 Re: Replication origins and timelines