| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE STATISTICS statistic_type documentation |
| Date: | 2017-05-25 17:13:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20170525171358.wr77iagejpb2ayae@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > If we invent more types in the future, would we expect those to be
> > defaulted to as well?
>
> I might be wrong, but my impression is that the plan is to default
> to gathering all possible stats types. So I'd probably write the
> addendum that way rather than naming those two types specifically.
Yes -- that plan has been hardcoded in ruleutils.c.
I'll patch.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2017-05-25 18:19:37 | Renaming a table to an array's autogenerated name |
| Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2017-05-25 17:10:46 | Re: Surjective functional indexes |