Re: 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64
Date: 2017-05-18 19:29:24
Message-ID: 20170518192924.jkrzevlencp3ggi6@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-18 <7a4d3b0f-78da-2a5b-7f3b-8b3509c1e183(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> If we had a typo or something in that code, the build farm should have
> caught it by now.
>
> I would try compiling with lower -O and see what happens.

Trying -O0 now.

Re: Andres Freund 2017-05-18 <20170518184811(dot)7c44jcvwjvnzczho(at)alap3(dot)anarazel(dot)de>
> Weird. Christoph, IIRC you can help gaining access to a porter machine
> to reproduce this?

I'll let the build run over night (the machine has 32 cores but is
dead slow) and see what I can arrange tomorrow. (Peter will already
have access, it's notker.debian.net.)

Christoph

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-18 19:31:34 Re: different column orders in regression test database
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2017-05-18 19:23:02 Re: 10beta1/m68k: static assertion failed: "MAXALIGN too small to fit int32"