Re: Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()
Date: 2017-05-11 00:15:17
Message-ID: 20170511001517.GA17200@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 01:09:36PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 05/10/2017 12:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >>> In terms of the alternatives I listed previously, it seems like
> >>> nobody liked alternatives #3, #4, or #5, leaving us with #1 (do
> >>> nothing) or #2 (apply this patch). By my count, Peter is the
> >>> only one in favor of doing nothing, and is outvoted. I'll push
> >>> the patch later today if I don't hear additional comments.
> >
> >> For the record, I also voted for doing nothing.
> >
> > Hm, well, anybody else want to vote?
>
> +1 for #2

Same, +1 for #2 (apply this patch)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-05-11 00:39:03 Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-05-10 23:07:43 Re: Fwd: Re: MSVC odd TAP test problem