From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 10 release notes |
Date: | 2017-04-25 03:05:41 |
Message-ID: | 20170425030541.GD7513@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:30:50AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I have committed the first draft of the Postgres 10 release notes. They
> > are current as of two days ago, and I will keep them current. Please
> > give me any feedback you have.
> >
>
> Some of the items which I feel could be added:
>
> 5e6d8d2bbbcace304450b309e79366c0da4063e4
> Allow parallel workers to execute subplans.
Uh, can you show me the commit on that and give some text ideas?
> 61c2e1a95f94bb904953a6281ce17a18ac38ee6d
> Improve access to parallel query from procedural languages.
I think I have that:
Increase parallel query usage in procedural language functions (Robert
Haas)
> In Parallel Queries section, we can add above two items as they
> increase the usage of the parallel query in many cases.
>
> ea69a0dead5128c421140dc53fac165ba4af8520
> Expand hash indexes more gradually.
That is in this item:
Improve hash bucket split performance by reducing locking requirements
(Amit Kapila, Mithun Cy)
Also cache hash index meta-information for faster lookups. Additional
hash performance improvements have also been made. pg_upgrade'd hash
indexes from previous major Postgres versions must be rebuilt.
Can you suggest additional wording? I did merge many of the hash items
into this so it would be understandable. You can see the commits in the
SGML source.
> I think the above commit needs a separate mention, as this is a really
> huge step forward to control the size of hash indexes.
Yes, it is unfotunate that the item is in the incompatibility item. I
wonder if I should split out the need to rebuild the hash indexes and
keep it there and move this item into the "Index" section.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-04-25 03:06:38 | Re: PG 10 release notes |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-04-25 03:00:50 | Re: PG 10 release notes |