| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Statistics "dependency" |
| Date: | 2017-04-23 14:01:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20170423140116.GA26652@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:44:12AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> For us "functional dependency" would sound like something to do with
> functions (e.g. CREATE FUNCTION), so just "dependency" appears to me
> to be the best term for this.
>
> There are multiple statistics for dependency stored, hence
> "dependencies". I don't like it, but its the best term I can see at
> present.
OK, thank you for the reply, and I am sorry I forgot the previous
discussion. I just wanted to re-check we had research this. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-04-23 14:16:57 | Do we need multi-column frequency/histogram stats? WAS Re: Statistics "dependency" |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-04-23 13:05:29 | Re: A note about debugging TAP failures |