| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly(dot)burovoy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: identity columns |
| Date: | 2017-04-21 06:46:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20170421064654.GD184144@rfd.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:53:36AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/18/17 02:07, Noah Misch wrote:
> > This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
>
> I am in disagreement with the submitter that this is a problem or what
> the solution should be. The discussion is ongoing. Note that the
> current state isn't actually broken, so it doesn't have to hold anything up.
I see. If anyone in addition to the submitter thinks making a change in this
area qualifies as a PostgreSQL 10 open item, please speak up. Otherwise, on
Monday, I'll reclassify this as a non-bug.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-04-21 07:02:06 | Re: some review comments on logical rep code |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-04-21 06:41:04 | Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |