From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries |
Date: | 2017-04-07 19:28:03 |
Message-ID: | 20170407192803.wz4sj5zge5swi2ih@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
> > - fair number of people don't think it's ready for v10.
Given the number of votes against putting this on pg10, I am going to
back off from this patch now, with an eye towards putting it in pg11 as
soon as the tree opens. Either I or Pavan are going to post another
version of this patch series, within the next couple of weeks, so that
others can base their testing, review and suggestions.
> > - can't move to next fest because it's waiting-on-author, which doesn't
> > allow that. Doesn't strike me as a useful restriction.
>
> I agree that that CF app restriction makes little sense.
What the restriction means is that if a patch is in waiting-on-author,
the proper "close" action is to return-with-feedback. There is no point
in moving the patch to the next commitfest if there is no further patch
version.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-07 19:30:52 | Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-04-07 19:24:18 | Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |