Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries
Date: 2017-04-07 18:49:08
Message-ID: 20170407184908.wzjqes6jgkfmqap5@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-04-07 15:45:33 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
> > - fair number of people don't think it's ready for v10.
>
> I'm going over this one now with Pavan, with the intent of getting it in
> committable shape.
>
> I may be biased, but the claimed performance gains are so large that I
> can't let it slip through without additional effort.

I strongly object to pushing it into v10. The potential negative impact
of a patch that touches the on-disk representation is also pretty
large. I think we'll have to discuss among a few more committers
whether we're ok with pushing this one.

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2017-04-07 18:50:12 Re: Performance issue with postgres9.6
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-07 18:48:28 Re: Remaining 2017-03 CF entries