Re: parallel explain analyze support not exercised

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel explain analyze support not exercised
Date: 2017-04-06 21:36:41
Message-ID: 20170406213641.tvpjk6smqw7cq3z6@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-04-06 17:33:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I guess we'll have to see. My personal conclusion is that greater
> > coverage of parallelism is worth some very minor config trouble for
> > people doing installcheck against clusters with non-default config.
>
> The buildfarm seems entirely unwilling to play along.

That was the parallel bitmap scan test, not this (I think). I've
already pushed a fix which should address the issue - it at least does
so locally. Both Dilip and I had apparently forgotten that we disallow
setting effective_io_concurrency on platforms without USE_PREFETCH
support.

- Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2017-04-06 21:41:24 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Collect and use multi-column dependency stats
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-06 21:33:49 Re: parallel explain analyze support not exercised