| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marc Tempelmeier <marc(dot)tempelmeier(at)flane(dot)de> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Keycloak and Postgres |
| Date: | 2017-04-05 11:54:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20170405075433.97d20f16d4b59dd776bef278@potentialtech.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 07:24:32 +0000
Marc Tempelmeier <marc(dot)tempelmeier(at)flane(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Can you elaborate a bit on this part:
> " Because of how Postgres caches changes, you may find that a failover requires some time in recovery mode."
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/wal-intro.html
The WAL requires that any unexpected shutdown of Postgres (where it doesn't get to explicitly
flush data pages to disk) go through a recovery cycle to fix anything in the WAL that is not
yet in the data pages.
Doing disk level replication and using that as a failover essentially duplicates a crash
on the PostgreSQL end when you failover.
--
Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vincent Veyron | 2017-04-05 13:11:36 | Re: browser interface to forums please? |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2017-04-05 11:07:23 | Re: Unexpected interval comparison |