Re: Keycloak and Postgres

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: Marc Tempelmeier <marc(dot)tempelmeier(at)flane(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Keycloak and Postgres
Date: 2017-04-05 11:54:33
Message-ID: 20170405075433.97d20f16d4b59dd776bef278@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 07:24:32 +0000
Marc Tempelmeier <marc(dot)tempelmeier(at)flane(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Can you elaborate a bit on this part:
> " Because of how Postgres caches changes, you may find that a failover requires some time in recovery mode."

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/wal-intro.html

The WAL requires that any unexpected shutdown of Postgres (where it doesn't get to explicitly
flush data pages to disk) go through a recovery cycle to fix anything in the WAL that is not
yet in the data pages.

Doing disk level replication and using that as a failover essentially duplicates a crash
on the PostgreSQL end when you failover.

--
Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vincent Veyron 2017-04-05 13:11:36 Re: browser interface to forums please?
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-04-05 11:07:23 Re: Unexpected interval comparison