From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Reduce src/test/recovery verbosity |
Date: | 2017-03-30 12:52:36 |
Message-ID: | 20170330125236.GT9812@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael,
* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> >> > If there's a way to change the verbosity for just those scripts, I'd be
> >> > happy to do that, if we're unable to agree on reducing it across the
> >> > board..
> >>
> >> I'd rather silence only scripts that are overly verbose.
> >
> > I'm fine with that, but how?
>
> The important point to me is not to show the tests that passed, it is
> to show the tests that are failing when running them. So I would
> suggest to just remove the --verbose flag in PROVE_FLAGS. If you do
> so, the test of pg_dump would show up like that, printing as well a
> count number while running:
Right, but you can't do that for just pg_dump.
I'd be fine with removing --verbose globally, as your patch does, but
there was some argument that we then would have long 'quiet' periods.
I haven't had a chance to go test if that's really the case yet though.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-03-30 12:57:21 | Re: [PATCH] Reduce src/test/recovery verbosity |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2017-03-30 12:25:49 | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |