Re: Logical decoding on standby

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical decoding on standby
Date: 2017-03-23 04:41:26
Message-ID: 20170323044126.oo6obzbqck6s425y@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-03-23 12:14:02 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 23 March 2017 at 09:39, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > I still think decoding-on-standby is simply not the right approach as
> > the basic/first HA approach for logical rep. It's a nice later-on
> > feature. But that's an irrelevant aside.
>
> I don't really agree that it's irrelevant.

I'm not sure we have enough time for either getting some parts of your
patch in, or for figuring out long term goals. But we definitely don't
have time for both.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-03-23 04:41:28 Re: scram and \password
Previous Message Rafia Sabih 2017-03-23 04:41:02 Re: Enabling parallelism for queries coming from SQL or other PL functions