From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Upgrading postmaster's log messages about bind/listen errors |
Date: | 2017-03-16 02:13:14 |
Message-ID: | 20170316021314.GA23899@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:50:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> >> I think that what would actually be of some use nowadays is a LOG-level
> >> message emitted if the wraparound *isn't* activated immediately at start.
> >> But otherwise, we should follow the rule that silence is golden.
>
> > Concretely, how about the attached? It preserves the original
> > "protections are now enabled" message at LOG level, but emits it only
> > when oldestOffsetKnown becomes true *after* startup. Meanwhile, if
> > oldestOffsetKnown is still not true at the conclusion of TrimMultiXact,
> > then it emits a new LOG message about "protections are not active".
>
> I realized that the second of these is not necessary because it's
> redundant with the message about "MultiXact member wraparound protections
> are disabled because oldest checkpointed MultiXact %u does not exist on
> disk". Pushed without that.
Gee, I kind of like the new messages:
LOG: listening on IPv4 address "127.0.0.1", port 5432
LOG: listening on Unix socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432"
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-16 02:19:53 | Re: Microvacuum support for Hash Index |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-16 01:54:52 | Re: logical replication access control patches |