From: | Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Tels <nospam-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning optimization for large amount of partitions |
Date: | 2017-03-10 12:16:58 |
Message-ID: | 20170310121657.GA25829@e733.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Tels,
Thanks a lot for the review!
> "corresponding"
Fixed.
> Also a question: Some one-line comments are
>
> /* Comment. */
>
> while others are
>
> /*
> * Comment.
> */
>
> Why the difference?
I'm trying to follow a code stile used in a code I'm modifying. In this
case I got an impression that second style of one-line comments is used
more often an I tried to follow it but apparently I didn't succeed :)
This is fixed as well.
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 06:40:39PM -0500, Tels wrote:
> Hi Aleksander,
>
> noticed this in your patch:
>
> > * Add a corespinding entry to pgStatTabHash.
>
> "corresponding"
>
> Also a question: Some one-line comments are
>
> /* Comment. */
>
> while others are
>
> /*
> * Comment.
> */
>
> Why the difference?
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Tels
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
partitioning_bottleneck_fix_v3.patch | text/x-diff | 4.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-03-10 12:49:34 | Re: New CORRESPONDING clause design |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-03-10 12:08:49 | Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes |