Re: ANALYZE command progress checker

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vinayak <Pokale_Vinayak_q3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ANALYZE command progress checker
Date: 2017-03-01 18:28:23
Message-ID: 20170301182823.7ug4vkyo4et3j33d@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-03-01 10:25:49 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> We now have a framework for this [1] (currently used by vacuum, but
> extensible). The question is about presentation. I'm fairly sure that
> we shouldn't just add yet another framework, and I doubt that that's
> what's proposed by Peter.
>
> [1]
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=c16dc1aca5e

Majority of that is actually in
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=b6fb6471f6afaf649e52f38269fd8c5c60647669

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-03-01 19:16:28 Re: Logical replication existing data copy
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-03-01 18:25:49 Re: ANALYZE command progress checker