From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: rename pg_log directory? |
Date: | 2017-02-28 03:01:15 |
Message-ID: | 20170228030115.GG11339@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:51:26AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > How about changing the default for log_directory from 'pg_log' to, say,
> > 'log'?
>
> > We have been emphasizing that the prefix "pg_" is for things reserved to
> > PostgreSQL, whereas the pg_log directory is entirely an arbitrary
> > user-space name. Also, with a different name, the directory would stand
> > out more between all the other pg_* directories in the data directory.
>
> No objection to the basic point, but "log" seems perhaps a little too
> generic to me. Would something like "server_log" be better?
"activity_log"? I like the idea of a rename.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-28 03:05:11 | Re: Backend crash on non-exclusive backup cancel |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-02-28 02:53:16 | Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode |