hight cpu %sy usage

From: "dbyzaa(at)163(dot)com" <dbyzaa(at)163(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: hight cpu %sy usage
Date: 2017-02-27 14:13:08
Message-ID: 2017022722130750897823@163.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

hello everyone,

i have PostgreSQL 9.5.3 server running on redhalt 6.6
when i run one query with pgbench the cpu is 80% and sy% is 60%

top
Cpu(s): 12.0%us, 53.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 35.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 529156900k total, 515292840k used, 13864060k free, 486228k buffers
Swap: 20479996k total, 0k used, 20479996k free, 291651484k cached

perf top
Samples: 12M of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 2442425371133
65.96% [kernel] [k] osq_lock
5.15% [kernel] [k] _spin_lock_irqsave
1.35% postgres [.] SearchCatCache
1.18% [kernel] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner
1.06% postgres [.] slot_deform_tuple
0.87% postgres [.] AllocSetAlloc
0.72% [kernel] [k] _spin_lock
0.68% postgres [.] LWLockAcquire
0.57% postgres [.] ExecInitExpr
0.55% libc-2.12.so [.] vfprintf
0.46% postgres [.] pg_encoding_mbcliplen
0.43% postgres [.] TupleDescInitEntry
0.40% [kernel] [k] schedule
0.25% libc-2.12.so [.] _int_malloc
0.25% postgres [.] hash_search_with_hash_value
0.25% libc-2.12.so [.] memcpy
0.25% postgres [.] PinBuffer
0.24% libc-2.12.so [.] __strlen_sse42
0.22% postgres [.] LWLockRelease
0.20% [kernel] [k] update_curr
0.19% postgres [.] MemoryContextAllocZeroAligned
0.19% [kernel] [k] select_idle_sibling
0.18% [kernel] [k] native_write_msr_safe
0.17% postgres [.] varstr_cmp
0.17% libc-2.12.so [.] __strncpy_ssse3
0.17% [kernel] [k] task_rq_lock
0.16% [kernel] [k] select_task_rq_fair
0.16% postgres [.] UnpinBuffer.clone.0
0.16% postgres [.] GetSnapshotData
0.16% [kernel] [k] __mutex_lock_slowpath
0.14% [kernel] [k] mutex_lock

1.the query runing is 2.7ms

2.query explain

Limit (cost=14.60..14.60 rows=1 width=262) (actual time=0.093..0.093 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=14.60..14.60 rows=1 width=262) (actual time=0.091..0.091 rows=1 loops=1)
Sort Key: a.order_date DESC
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.84..14.59 rows=1 width=262) (actual time=0.055..0.074 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.57..12.67 rows=1 width=289) (actual time=0.049..0.067 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using table_name_1_user_id_idx on table_name_1 a (cost=0.43..6.50 rows=1 width=233) (actual time=0.037..0.054 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((user_id)::text = 'xxxxxxxx'::text)
Filter: (((checkin_date)::text >= '20170223'::text) AND ((checkin_date)::text <= '20170224'::text) AND ((valid_flag)::text = '1'::text) AND ((order_state)::text = A
NY ('{2,3,4,5,8,B}'::text[])))
Rows Removed by Filter: 36
-> Index Scan using idx_table_name_2 on table_name_2 b (cost=0.14..6.16 rows=1 width=56) (actual time=0.002..0.003 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((a.company_id)::text = (company_id)::text)
-> Index Scan using idx_table_name_3 on table_name_3 ca (cost=0.27..1.90 rows=1 width=35) (actual time=0.003..0.004 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((b.company_id)::text = (company_id)::text)
Planning time: 0.965 ms
Execution time: 0.294 ms

3.sql
SELECT
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
b. column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
A .column_name,
ca.column_name,
FROM
table_name_1 A
LEFT JOIN table_name_2 b ON (A .company_id = b.company_id)
LEFT JOIN table_name_3 ca ON (b.company_id = ca.company_id)
WHERE
A .valid_flag = '1'
AND A .user_id = 'xxxxxxxx'
AND A .checkin_date >= '20170223'
AND A .checkin_date <= '20170224'
AND A .order_state IN ('2', '3', '4', '5', '8', 'B')
ORDER BY
A .order_date DESC
LIMIT 3 OFFSET 0;
(16 rows)

i reindex table_name_1_user_id_idx and try again is of no use.

i drop the btree index table_name_1_user_id_idx
create index table_name_1_user_id_idx on talbe_name_1 using hash(user_id);
vacuum analyze table_name_1

then the cpu is normal !!!!

I am very confused ,please help me find out the reasons for this situation
thank your!

dbyzaa(at)163(dot)com

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sven R. Kunze 2017-02-27 15:03:32 Re: ERROR: functions in index expression must be marked IMMUTABLE
Previous Message Thomas Güttler 2017-02-27 11:47:03 Re: via psycopg2 or pg2pg? Move rows from one database to other