| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter |
| Date: | 2017-02-27 06:03:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20170227060340.hfgstb2hglous2hd@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Hi,
On 2017-02-27 14:43:49 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I bumped into a case where it would have been rather useful to specify
> a service file path in a connection string with a service name. In my
> case, I have finished by setting up PGSERVICEFILE, but now like
> PGPASSFILE I think that being able to define the service file
> available as well as a connection parameter would be useful as well.
>
> I am not planning to work on that immediately (there is one day left
> for the last CF of PG10!), but I was wondering if people would be
> interested in something like that.
Hm - I'm not sure that's a good idea. service files are a libpq feature,
but connection strings are a bit more universal than just libpq...
Regards,
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2017-02-27 06:14:45 | Re: PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-02-27 05:58:41 | Re: SerializedSnapshotData alignment |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2017-02-27 06:14:45 | Re: PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-27 05:43:49 | PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter |