From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Create a separate test file for exercising system views |
Date: | 2017-01-29 21:12:19 |
Message-ID: | 20170129211219.nauhnm6uhcisysrq@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2017-01-29 16:02:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I did not do anything about testing the various pg_stat_xxx views.
> Those could be added later, or maybe they deserve their own home.
> (In many cases, those would need something smarter than the basic
> count(*) technique used here, because the C functions are invoked
> in the view's SELECT list not in FROM, so the planner would throw
> away those calls.)
I've previously wished there were a portable equivalent of \o /dev/null
that'd not be perfect, but it'd still exercise more than what we
currently have. Alternatively casting the entire row to text should
allow to use count(*) trickery in some of the cases at least.
> Comments/objections?
Sounds like a good idea here.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2017-01-29 21:34:00 | Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2017-01-29 21:07:04 | Re: CONNECTION LIMIT and Parallel Query don't play well together |