Re: Allow interrupts on waiting standby

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow interrupts on waiting standby
Date: 2017-01-26 20:36:39
Message-ID: 20170126203639.v5id47j3345nb6mu@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 26 January 2017 at 19:20, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> > I'm personally fine with going with a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
> > for now, but I think it'd better to replace it with a latch.
>
> I have waited, so not sure what you mean. Tomorrow is too late.
>
> Replacing with a latch wouldn't be backpatchable, IMHO.

Hmm, you pushed this to the master branch as commit e8ee3d6b859a, but I
see no backpatch.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-01-26 20:50:52 Re: Failure in commit_ts tap tests
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-26 20:24:43 Re: simplify sequence test