From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling) |
Date: | 2017-01-18 21:47:02 |
Message-ID: | 20170118214702.54b2mdbxce5piwv5@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2017-01-18 15:24:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Yea, have something lying around. Let me push it then when I get back from lunch?
>
> Sure, no sweat.
Pushed. Yay!
There's one sgml comment you'd added:
"Furthermore, nested set-returning functions did not work at all."
I'm not quite sure what you're referring to there - it was previously
allowed to have one set argument to an SRF:
postgres[28758][1]=# SELECT generate_series(1,generate_series(1,5));
┌─────────────────┐
│ generate_series │
├─────────────────┤
│ 1 │
│ 1 │
│ 2 │
│ 1 │
│ 2 │
│ 3 │
Am I misunderstanding what you meant? I left it in what I committed,
but we probably should clear up the language there.
Working on rebasing the cleanup patch now. Interested in reviewing
that? Otherwise I think I'll just push the rebased version of what I'd
posted before, after making another pass through it.
- Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2017-01-18 21:56:16 | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-01-18 21:39:25 | Re: Typo in hashsearch.c |