| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Cynthia Shang <cynthia(dot)shang(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
| Date: | 2017-01-12 18:40:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20170112184050.GK18360@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim,
* Jim Nasby (Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com) wrote:
> The way I see it, either one person can spend an hour or whatever
> creating an extension once, or every postgres install that's using
> any of these functions now has yet another hurdle to upgrading.
I just don't buy this argument, at all. These functions names are
certainly not the only things we're changing with PG10 and serious
monitoring/backup/administration tools are almost certainly going to
have quite a bit to adjust to with the new release, and that isn't news
to anyone who works with PG.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-12 18:41:24 | Re: BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issues with combined queries |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2017-01-12 18:38:16 | Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |