| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WARM and indirect indexes |
| Date: | 2017-01-11 15:32:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20170111153237.GC8584@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:28:28AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/10/2017 09:25 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >I am not saying we shouldn't do it, but I am afraid that the complexity
> >in figuring out when to use indirect indexes, combined with the number
> >of users who will try them, really hurts its inclusion.
> >
>
>
> I think you're making this out to be far more complex than it really is. You
> could argue the same about a great many features. Both of these features
> have upsides and downsides.
Right, and we do make such arguments --- what is your point?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Emre Hasegeli | 2017-01-11 15:37:59 | Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-01-11 15:29:58 | Re: WARM and indirect indexes |