Re: Replication/backup defaults

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Replication/backup defaults
Date: 2017-01-05 17:12:49
Message-ID: 20170105171249.fcuhqijmrpgz5nn4@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-01-05 18:08:36 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> > On 2017-01-05 08:38:32 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > I also suggest making the defaults for both 20 instead of 10. That
> > > leaves enough room that almost nobody ever has to change them, whereas
> > > 10 can be a bit tight for some not-outrageous installations (8 standbys
> > > plus backup?).
> >
> > I'm afraid we need to add initdb integration / testing for those. I mean
> > we have initdb test down to 10 connections to deal with limited
> > resources...
> >
>
> If we make both 10 by default we should be OK though, no?

I'm a bit doubtful about that. On the other hand, we've increased
max_parallel_workers without anybody complaining.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keith Fiske 2017-01-05 17:16:47 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-01-05 17:11:47 Re: ALTER SYSTEM for pg_hba.conf