Re: pgsql: Update copyright for 2017

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Update copyright for 2017
Date: 2017-01-04 15:08:18
Message-ID: 20170104150818.GO18360@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2017-01-03 13:02:28 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Yeah, I was doing parallel pulls of different branches in git via shell
> >> script, and it seems the size of this commit showed me that doesn't
> >> work. Sorry.
>
> > Shouldn't you check the results of something like this before pushing?
> > Sorry for piling on, but that seems like a quite critical step.
>
> Actually, my takeaway from this was "don't ever use git reset on the repo".
> "git revert" would have been much safer. Yeah, it would have meant that
> git blame on the 9.2 branch would have some useless noise, but how much
> does anyone still care about that?

+1.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-01-04 15:08:20 Re: pgsql: Update copyright for 2017
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-01-04 15:05:10 Re: pgsql: Update copyright for 2017

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-01-04 15:08:20 Re: pgsql: Update copyright for 2017
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2017-01-04 15:05:13 Re: UNDO and in-place update