From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE .. ALTER COLUMN .. ERROR: attribute .. has wrong type |
Date: | 2017-01-03 20:54:23 |
Message-ID: | 20170103205423.GW32031@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 03:35:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 03:18:15PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'm wondering if this represents some sort of out-of-sync condition
> >> between the table and its child tables. We can't actually tell from
> >> this trace which table is being processed. Could you try, from this
> >> breakpoint,
> >>
> >> f 3
> >> p oldrel->rd_rel->relname
>
> > (gdb) p oldrel->rd_rel->relname
> > $1 = {data = "eric_umts_rnc_utrancell_201701", '\000' <repeats 33 times>}
>
> Right. So I bet that if you check the attnum of pmsumpacketlatency_000 in
> eric_umts_rnc_utrancell_metrics, you'll find it's different from that in
> eric_umts_rnc_utrancell_201701, and that the attribute having that attnum
> in eric_umts_rnc_utrancell_201701 has type smallint not int.
I think that's consistent with what your understanding:
ts=# SELECT attrelid::regclass, attname, attnum, atttypid FROM pg_attribute WHERE attrelid::regclass::text~'eric_umts_rnc_utrancell_(metrics|201701)$' AND (attname='pmsumpacketlatency_000' OR attnum IN (367,424) ) ORDER BY 1,2;
eric_umts_rnc_utrancell_metrics | pmsamplespshsadchrabestablish | 367 | 21
eric_umts_rnc_utrancell_metrics | pmsumpacketlatency_000 | 424 | 23
eric_umts_rnc_utrancell_201701 | pmsumpacketlatency_000 | 367 | 23
eric_umts_rnc_utrancell_201701 | pmulupswitchsuccessmedium | 424 | 21
Justin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-01-03 20:57:18 | Re: Shrink volume of default make output |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-01-03 20:38:35 | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |