Re: speed concerns with executemany()

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: speed concerns with executemany()
Date: 2017-01-02 16:27:44
Message-ID: 20170102162744.wz2rzppurtyflsgo@hermes.hilbert.loc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: psycopg

> On 01/02/2017 08:07 AM, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > With NRECS=10000 and page size=100:
> > >
> > > aklaver(at)tito:~> python psycopg_executemany.py -p 100
> > > classic: 427.618795156 sec
> > > joined: 7.55754685402 sec
> >
> > Ugh! :D

While 7 as such may be a lot, a decrease from 427 to 7 is
simply brilliant.

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

Responses

Browse psycopg by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karsten Hilbert 2017-01-02 16:32:28 Re: speed concerns with executemany()
Previous Message Daniele Varrazzo 2017-01-02 16:24:47 Re: speed concerns with executemany()