Re: Experience with many schemas vs many databases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: undisclosed user <lovetodrinkpepsi(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Experience with many schemas vs many databases
Date: 2009-11-15 16:43:19
Message-ID: 20165.1258303399@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

undisclosed user <lovetodrinkpepsi(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I have hit a wall on completing a solution I am working on. Originally, the
> app used a db per user (on MyIsam)....the solution did not fair so well in
> reliability and performance. I have been increasingly interested in Postgres
> lately.

> Currently, I have about 30-35k users/databases. The general table layout is
> the same....only the data is different. I don't need to share data across
> databases. Very similar to a multi-tenant design.

Use multiple schemas, not multiple databases. If you had it working in
mysql then what you were using was more nearly schemas than databases
anyway --- it's unfortunate that the two systems use the same word
"database" for what are really different structures.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2009-11-15 18:54:29 Re: Experience with many schemas vs many databases
Previous Message Naoko Reeves 2009-11-15 14:38:50 Re: Fast Search on Encrypted Feild