Re: invalid non-zero objectSubId for object class

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michel Pelletier <pelletier(dot)michel(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: invalid non-zero objectSubId for object class
Date: 2020-07-10 00:32:37
Message-ID: 2016431.1594341157@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2020-Jul-09, Michel Pelletier wrote:
>> I don't seem to have either:
>>
>> dev=> select * from pg_depend where classid = 297108 or refclassid = 297108;
>> classid | objid | objsubid | refclassid | refobjid | refobjsubid | deptype
>> ---------+-------+----------+------------+----------+-------------+---------
>> (0 rows)

> Maybe try looking in pg_shdepend? Or pg_description?

I think it has to be pg_depend, because there'd be no reason to
be calling getObjectClass() on a entry from one of those other
catalogs during a DROP TABLE.

So my thoughts are now turning towards there being corruption
in pg_depend's indexes as well as the heap. Try doing the above
query after turning enable_indexscan and enable_bitmapscan off.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michel Pelletier 2020-07-10 00:37:25 Re: invalid non-zero objectSubId for object class
Previous Message Jeremy Schneider 2020-07-10 00:27:33 Re: Efficiently advancing a sequence without risking it going backwards.