From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Retire src/backend/port/dynloader/linux.c ? |
Date: | 2016-12-19 03:55:10 |
Message-ID: | 20161219035510.4svp7dw2ghv4byj4@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-12-18 22:19:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Shouldn't we just remove that code?
>
> What for?
I every now and then end up looking at it for a few minutes, and wonder
what the hell dld is, just to see that it's old stuff.
> It's maintenance-free ... hasn't been touched since 2004.
> While I agree with you that it's *probably* dead code, it's hard to
> see much upside from removing it.
>
> If we want to get into arguing whether code is dead or not, there's
> an awful lot of potentially removable stuff in the tree, but I doubt
> it's worth the trouble to figure out what's really dead.
Well, it's sometimes annoying to hit the code while looking around
that's actually dead. But I don't feel that strongly.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2016-12-19 04:59:08 | Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2016-12-19 03:36:14 | Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |