From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |
Date: | 2016-12-18 13:21:12 |
Message-ID: | 20161218132112.GC28523@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 02:14:06PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > turn
> > > into another section that we keep around (whether as part of the
> release
> > notes,
> > > or as a separate "upgrade steps" section or something).
> >
> > I suggest whatever we do, we place the information in a permanent
> > location that isn't moved or removed.
> >
> >
> >
> > +1. Absolutely. That's a very important point.
>
> That is really my only point --- wherever you put it, expect it to live
> there forever.
>
> Then in the end, it turns out we're in strong agreement :)
Yes, but there was talk of adding it to the docs, then removing it in
later releases --- that's what I think is a bad idea. I think it would
be logical to have a sub-document underneath each major release note
section with more detailed instructions. This could be done for minor
releases as well where necessary.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-12-18 13:54:32 | Re: Hash Indexes |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-12-18 13:14:06 | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |