| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Creating a DSA area to provide work space for parallel execution |
| Date: | 2016-12-16 17:38:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20161216173818.epde6vexiwyes7ll@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-12-16 12:33:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >> On 2016-12-16 11:41:49 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> > Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Hearing no objections, I've gone ahead and committed this. If that
> >>> makes somebody really unhappy I can revert it, but I am betting that
> >>> the real story is that nobody cares about preserving T_ID().
> >>
> >> I don't care about T_ID, but I do care about breaking extensions using
> >> lwlocks like for the 3rd release in a row or such. This is getting a
> >> bit ridiculous.
> >
> > Hmm, I hadn't thought about that. :-)
>
> Err, that was supposed to be :-( As in sad, not happy.
Both work for me ;)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-16 17:40:22 | Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-12-16 17:37:55 | Re: Creating a DSA area to provide work space for parallel execution |