Re: snapbuild woes

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snapbuild woes
Date: 2016-12-12 21:42:27
Message-ID: 20161212214227.qxspxdqqrprfvnz3@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2016-12-10 23:10:19 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Hi,
> First one is outright bug, which has to do with how we track running
> transactions. What snapbuild basically does while doing initial snapshot
> is read the xl_running_xacts record, store the list of running txes and
> then wait until they all finish. The problem with this is that
> xl_running_xacts does not ensure that it only logs transactions that are
> actually still running (to avoid locking PGPROC) so there might be xids
> in xl_running_xacts that already committed before it was logged.

I don't think that's actually true? Notice how LogStandbySnapshot()
only releases the lock *after* the LogCurrentRunningXacts() iff
wal_level >= WAL_LEVEL_LOGICAL. So the explanation for the problem you
observed must actually be a bit more complex :(

Regards,

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2016-12-12 21:47:44 Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/1] PostgreSQL db: Retry on constraint violation
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-12-12 21:22:25 Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument