| From: | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <ioguix(at)free(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marcin Giedz <marcin(dot)giedz(at)arise(dot)pl>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQl HA solution |
| Date: | 2016-11-30 20:08:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20161130210814.75ce46b9@firost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:58:13 -0800
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 06:00 AM, Marcin Giedz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does anyone know any reliable open source HA solution with stream
> > replication and IP live migration in case of master node failure?
> > Recently I've been attending Fujitsu PostgreSQL webinar and they
> > presented so called "mirroring controler" + sync stream replication .
> > I'm wondering if this combines of regular stream replication + some kind
> > of keepalive mechanism ?
>
> LinuxHA/Pacemaker/Corosync can do this.
Just for the record, PAF is a new resource agent for such stack. It just
replaces the default "pgsql" RA delivered in the resource-agents package on
various distro.
Regards,
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | George | 2016-11-30 20:08:36 | Re: Index is not used for "IN (non-correlated subquery)" |
| Previous Message | Patrick B | 2016-11-30 19:57:45 | Re: Monitoring Replication - Postgres 9.2 |