Re: citus 9.6?

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Jason Petersen <jason(at)citusdata(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL in Debian <pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: citus 9.6?
Date: 2016-11-14 09:53:30
Message-ID: 20161114095330.3bjgpfa6rzizv7to@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-debian

Re: Jason Petersen 2016-11-12 <73C4C228-2912-46B4-AFE6-4B4E4B7E453A(at)citusdata(dot)com>
> > On Oct 6, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Jason Petersen <jason(at)citusdata(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, it should definitely be out by then, and not having Citus in unstable is just fine. I’ll ping you when we produce the next release, which will have PostgreSQL 9.6 compatibility.
>
>
> Any updates?
>
> I got an email October 30th that Citus 5.1.1 was removed from testing (it had previously had some issue that its control file still read 9.5).
>
> We’ve tagged Citus v6.0.0 and pushed it to our own repos. I had an issue with the build in Jenkins (something about unexpected buildinfo files during the dput job?), but otherwise we should be good to re-add Citus to testing, now that it has PostgreSQL 9.6 compatibility.

Hi Jason,

the .buildinfo issue has been fixed by telling reprepro to ignore the
files.

I've put the package live on apt.pg.o and uploaded it to Debian as
well.

Christoph

Browse pgsql-pkg-debian by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2016-11-14 09:58:11 Re: "buildinfo" files causing failed dput job?
Previous Message apt.postgresql.org repository 2016-11-14 09:39:23 pgbackrest updated to version 1.10-1.pgdg+1