Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jan de Visser <jan(at)de-visser(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hao Lee <mixtrue(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files?
Date: 2016-11-13 09:20:06
Message-ID: 20161113092006.trsvrpj6xaar6xfh@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-11-13 00:20:22 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 11/11/16 11:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > boolin: OID=1242 proname=boolin proargtypes="cstring" prorettype=bool
> > boolin: prosrc=boolin provolatile=i proparallel=s
>
> Then we're not very far away from just using CREATE FUNCTION SQL commands.

Well, those do a lot of syscache lookups, which in turn do lookups for
functions...

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-11-13 09:21:40 Re: Logical Replication WIP
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-11-13 09:18:41 Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability