Re: Locking question

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Frank Millman <frank(at)chagford(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Locking question
Date: 2016-10-26 08:46:56
Message-ID: 20161026084656.23q5u6lkxfyde5vj@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:42:29AM +0200, Frank Millman wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am designing an inventory application, and I want to ensure that the stock level of any item cannot go negative.
>
> Instead of maintaining a running balance per item, I store the original quantities received in one table (call it ‘inv_rec’), and any amounts removed in another table (call it ‘inv_alloc’).
>
> CREATE TABLE inv_rec
> (row_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
> product_id INT REFERENCES inv_products,
> qty INT);
>
> CREATE TABLE inv_alloc
> (row_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
> rec_id INT REFERENCES inv_rec,
> qty INT);
>
> To get the balance of a particular item -
>
> SELECT SUM(
> a.qty + COALESCE(
> (SELECT SUM(b.qty) FROM inv_alloc b
> WHERE b.rec_id = a.row_id), 0))
> FROM inv_rec a
> WHERE a.product_id = 99;
>
> To remove a quantity from a particular item -
>
> INSERT INTO inv_alloc (rec_id, qty)
> VALUES (23, -1);
> Is this the correct approach, or am I missing something?

What I would do, is to add trigger on inv_alloc, than when you
insert/update/delete row there, it updates appropriate row in inv_rec by
correct number.

Then, I'd add check on inv_rec to make sure qty is never < 0.

Best regards,

depesz

--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Frank Millman 2016-10-26 10:18:19 Re: Locking question
Previous Message Frank Millman 2016-10-26 08:42:29 Locking question