Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
Date: 2016-10-17 20:19:35
Message-ID: 20161017201935.gwy3n5c5j7v6pc3a@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-10-17 16:16:37 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I wouldn't think that cross-file references would be especially
> common. Functions that take PG_FUNCTION_ARGS and return Datum aren't
> a lot of fun to call from C. But maybe I'm wrong.

There's a fair number of DirectFunctionCall$Ns over the backend.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-10-17 20:35:11 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replace PostmasterRandom() with a stronger way of generating ran
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-10-17 20:16:37 Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1