| From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix |
| Date: | 2016-10-12 18:20:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20161012182044.44ctmiwtcg7e72lz@msg.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Jeff Janes 2016-10-12 <CAMkU=1zmOp5T70MX508nwFf8tvv2jOT+hGwLq8fNHLSxp-wVmQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> Do you think the pushback will come from people who just accept the
> defaults?
I'm concerned about readability. "2016-10-12 20:14:30.449 CEST" is a
lot of digits. My eyes can parse "20:14:30" as a timestamp, but
"20:14:30.449" looks more like an IP address. (Admittedly I don't have
experience with reading %m logs.)
Overall, I'd prefer %t but %m would be ok as well.
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-10-12 18:25:43 | Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-10-12 18:09:40 | Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) |