Re: Supporting huge pages on Windows

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Supporting huge pages on Windows
Date: 2016-10-10 21:00:43
Message-ID: 20161010210043.ynnm7yxgsjlre3qo@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-10-11 09:57:48 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Later in that thread there was a report of a dramatic ~15% increase in
> "best result" TPS, but that was with 60GB of shared_buffers on a
> machine with 256GB of RAM:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20131024060313.GA21888%40toroid.org

FWIW, I've seen 2-3x increases with ~60GB of s_b.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-10-10 21:56:09 Re: memory leak in e94568ecc10 (pre-reading in external sort)
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2016-10-10 20:57:48 Re: Supporting huge pages on Windows