From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
Date: | 2016-09-28 20:02:55 |
Message-ID: | 20160928200255.GA5148@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > I cannot to imagine any use case for proposed format.
>
> My vote (which was not counted by Stephen) was to remove it from \df+
Oh, sorry about that, not sure how I missed it. :/
> altogether. I stand by that. People who are used to seeing the output
> in \df+ will wonder "where the heck did it go" and eventually figure it
> out, at which point it's no longer a problem. We're not breaking
> anyone's scripts, that's for sure.
>
> If we're not removing it, I +0 support the option of moving it to
> footers. I'm -1 on doing nothing.
This is more-or-less the same position that I have.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2016-09-28 20:06:57 | Re: ICU integration |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-09-28 19:59:26 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |