From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel build with MSVC |
Date: | 2016-09-08 05:46:32 |
Message-ID: | 20160908054632.GA3614153@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 02:43:48PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > Every vcbuild and msbuild invocation ought to recognize this variable, so
> > please update the two places involving ecpg_regression.proj. Apart from that,
> > the patch looks good.
>
> Good catch. I did not notice those during my lookups of those patches.
> Not my intention to bump into Christian's feet, but here are updated
> patches.
Committed.
> Actually, is that worth adding for clean.bat? I doubt that many people
> would care if MSBFLAGS is not supported in it. The cleanup script is
> not the bottleneck, the build script is. I added it in the patch 0001
> attached but I doubt that's worth it to be honest.
If parallelism were the only consideration, then I would agree. We don't
know, in general, how each operation will respond to arbitrary flags the user
selects. I did remove your clean.bat documentation change; documenting
MSBFLAGS in the one place suffices.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-09-08 06:35:46 | Re: Supporting SJIS as a database encoding |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-09-08 05:36:53 | Re: autonomous transactions |