From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | julyanto SUTANDANG <julyanto(at)equnix(dot)co(dot)id> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |
Date: | 2016-08-29 19:52:47 |
Message-ID: | 20160829195247.GA9468@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:45:22AM +0700, julyanto SUTANDANG wrote:
> I thought that the real term of Parallel Query should talk about Query in a
> Host, Not multi host.
> When multihost (clusters) is the context, of course it is parallel execution of
> query in every single host with single query each. So, applying term Parallel
> Query as the first RDBMS implement it, i think it is correct.
I think we added a "parallel CPU query" feature.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-08-29 20:08:56 | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |
Previous Message | julyanto SUTANDANG | 2016-08-29 19:45:22 | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |