Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: julyanto SUTANDANG <julyanto(at)equnix(dot)co(dot)id>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?
Date: 2016-08-29 19:52:47
Message-ID: 20160829195247.GA9468@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:45:22AM +0700, julyanto SUTANDANG wrote:
> I thought that the real term of Parallel Query should talk about Query in a
> Host, Not multi host. 
> When multihost (clusters) is the context, of course it is parallel execution of
> query in every single host with single query each. So, applying term Parallel
> Query as the first RDBMS implement it, i think it is correct. 

I think we added a "parallel CPU query" feature.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2016-08-29 20:08:56 Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?
Previous Message julyanto SUTANDANG 2016-08-29 19:45:22 Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?