Re: Why is a newly created index contains the invalid LSN?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is a newly created index contains the invalid LSN?
Date: 2016-08-26 21:17:25
Message-ID: 20160826211725.cnqxozh6idzm6jjc@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-08-26 18:46:42 +0300, Yury Zhuravlev wrote:
> Thanks all.
> Now understand LSN strongly connected with WAL.
> However how difficult put last system LSN instead 0?
> It's not so important but will allow make use LSN more consistent.

Maybe explain why you're interested in page lsns, that'd perhaps allow
us to give more meaningful feedback.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-08-26 21:20:15 Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-08-26 21:15:41 Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog