Re: does md5 really help against sniffing?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: jens(dot)timmerman(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: does md5 really help against sniffing?
Date: 2016-08-25 22:41:43
Message-ID: 20160825224143.GA26412@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 03:35:17PM +0000, jens(dot)timmerman(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/auth-methods.html
> Description:
>
> this page claims
> &#39;If you are at all concerned about password &quot;sniffing&quot; attacks then md5 is
> preferred. &#39;
> but how does this really help? If an md5 hash is enough to get access, then
> sniffing an md5has is actually the same as sniffing the password?&#39;

There is random salt added to the network md5 hash. Please read the
docs on this.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-08-26 13:07:14 Re: undocumented feature or bug in subquery : psql (PostgreSQL) 9.4.6 on SLES12 SP1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-08-25 16:33:01 Re: Order of Operations for Update Command