Re: pgsql: Mark read/write expanded values as read-only in ValuesNext(), to

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Mark read/write expanded values as read-only in ValuesNext(), to
Date: 2016-08-24 23:41:52
Message-ID: 20160824234152.coh3p6nble7fyrfj@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 2016-06-03 22:07:21 +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also add a regression test case exercising the same scenario for
> FunctionScan. That's not broken right now, because the function's
> result will get shoved into a tuplestore between generation and use;
> but it could easily become broken whenever we get around to optimizing
> FunctionScan better.

Indeed, I just locally broke that for a few minutes. Thanks for that.

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-08-25 01:11:49 pgsql: doc: more replacement of <literal> with something better
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-08-24 20:29:37 pgsql: postgres_fdw: Cosmetic cleanup.