From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
Date: | 2016-08-18 20:10:51 |
Message-ID: | 20160818201051.scqeee2yxjgpyqzf@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-08-18 15:55:20 -0400, Christian Convey wrote:
> * Allow the CMake-based build system to assume a fairly modern version
> of CMake. (Maybe 2.8.12, or 3.0.)
>
> * For systems where the minimum CMake version isn't readily available,
> have an alternative build system which is just a simplistic Bash
> script that naively performs a full build every time it's invoked.
> The idea being that PG contributors are mostly the people who want
> efficient rebuilds, and most/all of them could easily install that
> minimal CMake version.
The benefit cmake brings to the table, from my pov, is that it allows to
get rid of somewhat a parallel buildsystem (msvc / windows, which
sources most of its information from the makefiles). If we continue to
have two, especially if they're entirely separate, I see little benefit
in this whole endeavor.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-08-18 20:11:27 | Re: Patch: initdb: "'" for QUOTE_PATH (non-windows) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-08-18 20:06:15 | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |