Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: dandl <david(at)andl(dot)org>
Cc: 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 'Pg Hackers' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Date: 2016-08-17 00:54:22
Message-ID: 20160817005422.qjw7xvnbsbihqykv@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 2016-08-17 10:45:25 +1000, dandl wrote:
> From my particular perspective it would be enough if all the internal
> headers (that one needs to use in writing server-side extensions) were
> completely usable in C++.

That should already be the case. There's even a dirty hack^WWscript
that checks that that remains the case (src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-08-17 01:02:52 Re: what change in postgres 9.5 improvements for multi-CPU machines
Previous Message dandl 2016-08-17 00:45:25 Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-08-17 01:16:02 Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-08-17 00:45:42 Re: anyelement -> anyrange